British paper replies Cameron on Nigeria corruption comment
British Prime Minister, David Cameron
British Newspaper, The Guardian, has replied British Prime Minister, David Cameron on his comment about 'fantastically corrupt' Nigeria and Afghanistan.
In its editorial, the newspaper said he 'is guilty of epic hypocrisy.'
Below is the Editorial:
There are times
when a manual earth-restructuring implement is best referred to as a
spade, so let us speak plainly. A summit on corruption will be held on
Thursday in a city that is internationally recognised (by the IMF, among
others) as a tax haven. It is being hosted by a politician who admitted
last month that he has personally profited from offshore finance and
whose party is bankrolled by an industry that makes extravagant use of
those same tax havens. Not only that, he has intervened to aid tax avoiders. That’s right, David Cameron is holding a meeting on corruption.
The prime minister
is not personally corrupt – but he is certainly guilty of epic
hypocrisy. So, for that matter, are Britain and the west. They have
spent decades ordering poor countries and failed states to sort out
their problems with dodgy money, even while taking much of that dodgy
money and ploughing it through their banks, their ritzy stores, their
estate agents, and their offshore tax havens – with barely any questions
asked or eyebrows raised. WhenMr Cameron was caught on camera on Tuesday boasting to the Queen of the “fantastically corrupt countries”
turning up at Lancaster House this week, he might have mentioned that
Afghanistan is a failed state that did not get any less failed over 13
years of British intervention. And he should certainly have mentioned
that the president of Nigeria, Muhammadu Buhari, is coming to London
to lobby it to sort out the tax havens in its own backyard.
Indeed, Mr Cameron might have quoted a letter sent to him a fortnight ago by campaigners in Nigeria.
“We are embarked on
a nationwide anti-corruption campaign,” the letter said. “But these
efforts are sadly undermined if countries such as your own are welcoming
our corrupt to hide their ill-gotten gains in your luxury homes,
department stores, car dealerships, private schools and anywhere else
that will accept their cash with no questions asked. The role of
London’s property market as vessels to conceal stolen wealth has been
exposed in court documents, reports, documentaries and more.” So the
president of the Nigerian senate, Bukola Saraki, currently facing
allegations that he failed to declare his assets, owns a property in
London’s Belgravia in his own name. But last month’s Panama Papers
revealed that the £5.7m property next door is owned by companies
incorporated in the Seychelles and British Virgin Islands, whose
respective shareholders are Saraki’s wife and former special assistant.
And a £1.65m townhouse in Kensington is shown as belonging to a BVI
company whose sole shareholder is Folorunsho Coker, former head of the
number plate production authority of the state of Lagos and currently
business adviser to the governor of Lagos. None of these individuals may
have done anything wrong, but the charge from those campaigners is hard
to duck. Under successive governments, from Thatcher to Blair to
Cameron, London has become the financial centre for the world’s dirty
money.
A third of all the trillions hiding offshore are sitting in tax havens linked to the UK,
according to Oxfam. These havens rely on Britain for security and
protection. The Jersey pound note features the Queen. On the Caymans,
they sing as the national anthem God Save the Queen. Yet Whitehall
persists in pretending they are autonomous – even though London has
overridden them before, on the abolition of capital punishment, say, or
the decriminalising of homosexual acts. It will not do so on shady
finance, however. The result is that Britain will soon bring in a public register of who ultimately owns the companies listed here
– even while its overseas territories won’t. The Caymans and the rest
claim that this is because they are home to perfectly legitimate
operations – in which case, what have they got to hide?
This fudge suits both the City and the havens. The accountancy firms and tax lawyers and wealth managers in London will
continue to reap fat fees by using their branch offices scattered across
offshore Britain to look after clients seeking low tax and secrecy –
even while the UK can claim that its domestic financial industry is as
clean as can be. Few will call this corruption or hypocrisy, as it wears
a sharp suit and talks so nicely.
In Oscar Wilde’s
The Importance of Being Earnest, Cecily implores Gwendolen: “This is no
time for wearing the shallow mask of manners. When I see a spade I call
it a spade.” The reply comes: “I am glad to say that I have never seen a
spade. It is obvious that our social spheres have been widely
different.”
Comments
Post a Comment